14 March 2025
Bolderdijk and his colleagues from the University of Groningen looked at how people can be influenced to make more sustainable choices.
New words, or neologisms, appear often in discussions about climate change. For example, the term ‘flight shame’ describes the guilt people feel about flying because of its environmental impact. But do these new words only show changing attitudes, or can they also help or slow down social change?
Using insights gained from linguistics and environmental psychology, the team saw that that neologisms possibly speed up or block social change. However, this topic has not yet been fully explored. New words help people understand new ideas. They make it easier to talk about complex issues. This can increase awareness and influence behavior.
New words can also change how people see climate problems. This is important because how we describe an issue affects how we react to it. For example, ‘climate crisis’ sounds more urgent than ‘climate change’.
Using theories from cognitive science and ecolinguistics (the study of language and the environment), Bolderdijk and his colleagues explain how new words can:
To understand these effects, they looked at climate words used frequently between the 1970s and 2018. These terms help shape climate discussions:
By understanding the power of language, the researchers show how words can potentially be used to motivate people to take action and help fight climate change.
For more detailed information, read the paper The Role of Neologisms in the Climate Change Debate: Can New Words Help to Speed Up Social Change? Authors: Greta Zella, Tommaso Caselli and Saskia Peels-Matthey (University of Groningen) and Jan Willem Bolderdijk (UvA Amsterdam Business School).