For best experience please turn on javascript and use a modern browser!
You are using a browser that is no longer supported by Microsoft. Please upgrade your browser. The site may not present itself correctly if you continue browsing.
Overconsumption drives climate issues by causing material scarcity and carbon emissions, with wealthy nations being the main culprits. Reducing consumption could help mitigate environmental problems, but there are concerns that it might harm human well-being. We set out to explore if it's possible to cut back on consumption while maintaining well-being.

What Did You Want to Know?

We wanted to understand the relationship between reduced consumption and individual well-being. Specifically, we aimed to see if cutting back on consumption in wealthy nations could positively or negatively impact people's sense of well-being.

What Did You Find Out?

We reviewed 38 studies on this topic and found that most suggest reduced consumption is either associated with higher well-being or has no significant impact. Only a few studies pointed to potential negative effects. This indicates that reducing consumption generally does not harm, and may even enhance, well-being in wealthy nations.

What Does This Mean?

Our findings suggest that reducing consumption can lead to higher well-being, challenging the notion that less consumption means lower quality of life. Policymakers can use this evidence to support sustainability goals that include reducing consumption. Policies should push companies to shift from a growth-centered model to one that meets genuine needs, while being mindful of potential negative consequences. Cultural and societal factors must be considered to design effective interventions for reduced consumption.

Where can I read more?

Vollebregt, M., Mugge, R., Thürridl, C., & van Dolen, W. (2024). Reducing without losing: Reduced consumption and its implications for well-being. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 45, 91–103.